Thursday, October 8, 2009

Richard Bejtlich on Technical Visibility

Security guru Richard Bejtlich's latest post describes a scale with which we can measure the Technical Visibility of a piece of technology. In the post he suggests that the technology we use is becoming increasingly feature-rich without a corresponding move toward open architecture, threatening our ability to trust what a device/application/machine is really doing behind the scenes. The question is how do you measure the true *need* for a certain level of Technical Visibility? In other words, I think we would benefit from a scale that relates both the properties of a piece of technology (for example, ip enabled vs non-ip enabled) and the context in which it is used (for example storing confidential information vs. storing my grocery list), to a specific level of Technical Visibility. The concept does, in my mind, bring up familiar questions about how certain companies decide how much access the consumer should have to study the inner-workings of a device like, for example, the iPhone...

1 comments:

lwqtbp84vv said...

More than fifty p.c of the greenhouse gases come from buildings and the construction industry…. TE Connectivity, for example, just lately designed and 3D printed a prototype mounting holder for its D369 connectors at the request of an aerospace producer. The holder appropriately and securely mates connectors that are be} mounted inside aircraft enclosures. Some switches that House Shoes for Women CSI uses in its harnesses are printed by a third get together and despatched again. According to Farell, these switches must be mounted to a PCB via the stereolithography printing course of. Wire harness producer Cesar-Scott Inc. additionally depends on FDM-based 3D printers to supply connector holders.

Post a Comment